Although astronomy does not refer to the aspect of planets, however, a specific case of the
alignment of planets gives a confusing problem to the law of astrology sometimes encountered.
In the above two examples, sky bodies are arranged in a particular instance. Body B in left
view moves a little to the right side arrow to form 90 degrees or square aspect on the surface
of ecliptic located. While body B in right view moves a little to the left side arrow to
form 120 degrees or trine aspect on the surface of ecliptic located.
Let us consider the wall face in the right side of upper illustration. Bp1 on the wall will
form zero degree aspect or conjunction aspect with the center planet Cp that is projected on
the wall found. Regardless the movement of planet B, either in the left view or right view,
the indication on the straight wall remains in the same conjunction aspect astrologically
defined. Although the definition in astronomy is limited to a particular moving body
specifically defined, the span of observation on the other moving bodies must be extended
all over 360 degrees sky simultaneously projected in astrology studied. This means
that the inclination of inside wall of the Great Circle will change auxiliary in accordance
with the related planet in aspect formed all over the span of 360 degrees sky without
specifying any limit in astrology studied.
We astrologers are dealing with remote planets through out the span of total sky. We study on
a planet in Aries, a planet in Leo and a planet in Sagittarius simultaneously that are forming
grand trine aspect defined. As three planets are observed in another portion of sky each other,
the projected surface inside Great Circle will not remain in the same angle looked against line
of project observed. Although RAPHAEL studied with the knowledge of astronomy on the terms of
declination against the ecliptic line, this was insufficient with an error as the problem is
not in the astronomical declination defined. It is in a projected surface inclination looked
against the center of earth observed. This author has suggested a new idea to solve this
difficulty as you will fund in my note published in AFA Bulletin in 2001 released.
AS THIS IS STILL INCOMPLETE AND FURTHER HELP FROM READERS WILL BE APPRECIATED.
