The above illustration will indicate the reliability of reported research data of 290,738 or three hundred thousand approximately cases released in the 600 pages
book of Recent Advances in Natal Astrology published under the aegis of The Astrological Association AA in 1977.
The number of samples in the researches reported against the value of Variance calculated. The probability line
of p=0.05 in red marked will indicate the odds against chance in the occurrence of ration for 20 to one. The data
found in the above space of this line will be in the region to reject the null hypothesis or the hypothesis
of denial of astrology that these
laws of astrology will be reliable for prediction of item performed. Several of white circles including the aircraft disasters
studied by this author
will be enough for high level of significance that the reports are reliable. The most
reports found in the black circles below the line of p=0.01 or in the odds against chance of the ratio for 100 to one will be
the researches came from unreliable data in the rage of accidental coincidence classified.
Students must be very careful to test the preferable method of choice in one sign among twelve sets of signs.
The probability to make a choice, for instance the Aries sign out of twelve signs will be p= 1/12 or 0.083. Therefore,
we should have p=0.05 or less for the calculated p in the compiled data before we can clear the rejection of the null
hypothesis in which the reliability of astrology was denied temporally settled. Traditional simple method to compare
the obtained number of cases in the preferred system against that of found in the other case might not be accepted
unless the preferred data is in p=0.05 or far less. As you will find in the white circles of the reliable test of examples in the
range of p=0.000001 or less, these data will be reliable enough to reject the null hypothesis. On the other hand,
the black circles of most astrological examples are located in the region of the accidental coincidence.